Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-09-19

[PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: arch_timer: Work around QorIQ Erratum A-008585

From: oss@buserror.net (Scott Wood)
Date: 2016-09-19 04:31:45
Also in: linux-devicetree

On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 14:07 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 12/09/16 13:59, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:44:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:36:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
The changes in arm64's <asm/arch_timer.h> are going to conflict with
some cleanup [1,2] that just landed in the arm64 for-next/core
branch.

Could you please rebase atop of that?
Well, we should figure out what tree this is going through first.
There
are a mixture of arm, arm64, driver and dts changes here and not all
of it is carrying the appropriate acks for me to queue it.
Given that mix, I had assumed that this would all go through the arm64
tree -- I see that Rob has already acked the binding, and I'm happy to
give my ack for the driver once that's in shape.
Now I see that I'd missed the arch/arm changes in patch 4, which lack a
relevant ack.

Given that, I don't know what to suggest.
I wouldn't mind delaying patch 4 until it gets acked by RMK, as it
doesn't impact the functionality.
Mark asked me to move that patch before the workaround patch, to avoid ever
having to add more code that messes with the name. ?Should I keep the order as
is then?

-Scott
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help