Rob,
On 09/07/2016 10:35 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 07-09-16, 09:36, Dave Gerlach wrote:

quoted

On 09/07/2016 12:12 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

On 31-08-16, 21:53, Dave Gerlach wrote:

quoted

+In 'operating-points-v2' table:
+- compatible: Should be
+	- 'operating-points-v2-ti-am3352-cpu' for am335x SoCs
+	- 'operating-points-v2-ti-am4372-cpu' for am43xx SoCs
+	- 'operating-points-v2-ti-dra7-cpu' for dra7xx/am57xx SoCs

Why do you need SoC specific compatible here? Are you defining new
fields in OPP tables for your SoC ? How are the tables for your case
going to differ from the ones using "operating-points-v2" compatible
string?

I thought you had suggested that I do this in your comments from v1, but I
guess that was dependent on whether or not I put the properties I have
inserted into the cpu node into the operating-points table instead.

Yes.

quoted

I still
have gotten no comments from any DT maintainers so I left it as is. I am
still not sure if that is acceptable.

@Rob: Can you please share your views on the new properties being
added to the CPU node ?

I am fine moving the properties in the operating-points-v2 node or 
leaving it as is, whichever is preferred.

Viresh, thanks for your comments.

Regards,
Dave