Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2016-09-27

[PATCH v2 3/8] i2c: bcm2835: Use ratelimited logging on transfer errors

From: Martin Sperl <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-27 13:02:10
Also in: linux-i2c, lkml

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 27 Sep 2016, at 13:57, Noralf Tr?nnes [off-list ref] wrote:

Writing to an AT24C32 generates on average 2x i2c transfer errors per
32-byte page write. Which amounts to a lot for a 4k write. This is due
to the fact that the chip doesn't respond during it's internal write
cycle when the at24 driver tries and retries the next write.
Reduce this flooding of the log by using dev_err_ratelimited().

Signed-off-by: Noralf Tr?nnes <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <redacted>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
index df036ed..370a322 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
@@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static int bcm2835_i2c_xfer_msg(struct bcm2835_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
       (msg->flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK))
       return 0;

-    dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "i2c transfer failed: %x\n", i2c_dev->msg_err);
+    dev_err_ratelimited(i2c_dev->dev, "i2c transfer failed: %x\n",
+                i2c_dev->msg_err);
Do we really need this error message at all?

Maybe just remove it instead, because error messages during 
"normal"/successfull operations of at24 seems  strange.

Or make it a debug message instead.

Martin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help