Hi Stephen,
2016-09-23 23:47 GMT+02:00 Stephen Boyd [off-list ref]:
On 09/21, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
quoted
@@ -203,80 +202,75 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- cp110_clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct clk *),
- CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!cp110_clks)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
- sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
+ cp110_clk_data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
+ sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
GFP_KERNEL);
This doesn't look right. Why are calloc()ing clk_hw_onecell_data this
way?
After some time, at a first sight it seems I should've used following:
cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data) +
sizeof(struct
clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
GFP_KERNEL);
I'll re-check, but is that what you meant?
Best regards,
Marcin