On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki [off-list ref] wrote:

On 17 August 2016 at 13:34, Rafa? Mi?ecki [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 8 July 2016 at 01:08, Jon Mason [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

        mode = (bgmac_read(bgmac, BGMAC_DEV_STATUS) & BGMAC_DS_MM_MASK) >>
                BGMAC_DS_MM_SHIFT;
-       if (ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM47162 || mode != 0)
+       if (bgmac->feature_flags & BGMAC_FEAT_CLKCTLST || mode != 0)
                bgmac_set(bgmac, BCMA_CLKCTLST, BCMA_CLKCTLST_FORCEHT);
-       if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM47162 && mode == 2)
+       if (bgmac->feature_flags & BGMAC_FEAT_CLKCTLST && mode == 2)
                bcma_chipco_chipctl_maskset(&bgmac->core->bus->drv_cc, 1, ~0,
                                            BGMAC_CHIPCTL_1_RXC_DLL_BYPASS);

Jon, it looks to me you translated two following conditions:
ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM47162
and
ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM47162
into the same flag check:
bgmac->feature_flags & BGMAC_FEAT_CLKCTLST

I don't think it's intentional, is it? Do you have a moment to fix this?

Ping

Sorry, just seeing this now.  I'll double check the original code and
verify it (or fix it).

Thanks,
Jon

--
Rafa?