[PATCH v4 2/2] soc: qcom: add l2 cache perf events driver
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2016-09-16 16:40:40
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:33:39AM -0400, Neil Leeder wrote:
Hi Mark, Thank you for the thorough review. I will post an updated patchset which addresses all of your comments. There is just one outstanding comment which I have a question about:
[...]
On 9/1/2016 12:30 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 01:01:33PM -0400, Neil Leeder wrote:quoted
+ /* Don't allow groups with mixed PMUs, except for s/w events */ + if (event->group_leader->pmu != event->pmu && + !is_software_event(event->group_leader)) { + dev_warn(&l2cache_pmu->pdev->dev, + "Can't create mixed PMU group\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + list_for_each_entry(sibling, &event->group_leader->sibling_list, + group_entry) + if (sibling->pmu != event->pmu && + !is_software_event(sibling)) { + dev_warn(&l2cache_pmu->pdev->dev, + "Can't create mixed PMU group\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + hwc->idx = -1; + hwc->config_base = event->attr.config; + + /* + * Ensure all events are on the same cpu so all events are in the + * same cpu context, to avoid races on pmu_enable etc. + */ + slice = get_hml2_pmu(event->cpu); + event->cpu = slice->on_cpu;This could put an event on a different CPU to its group siblings, which is broken.This is the same logic as in arm-ccn.c:arm_ccn_pmu_event_init(), where there is a single CPU designated as the CPU to be used for all events. All events for this slice are forced to slice->on_cpu which is the CPU set in the cpumask for this slice.
The CCN is a little different. For the CCN, a single CPU is designated to handle *all* events. For this driver, a CPU is designated per-slice, judging by the existence of hml2_pmu::on_cpu (unless that's superfluous). We've only verified that the events are all for this PMU, not the same slice, and thus each event->cpu may differ.
I'm not sure how this can put an event on a different CPU to its group siblings?
In practice today, we'll try to schedule the event on it's group leader's CPU, but accounting and subsequent manipulation could go wrong. Thanks, Mark.