Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 2 authors, 2016-09-19

[PATCH v8 6/9] drm/mediatek: add dsi interrupt control

From: CK Hu <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-13 08:55:14
Also in: dri-devel, linux-mediatek, lkml

Hi, YT:

On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 20:01 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
From: shaoming chen <redacted>

add dsi interrupt control

Signed-off-by: shaoming chen <redacted>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
[snip...]
 
+static void mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
+{
+	u32 inten = DSI_INT_ALL_BITS;
+
+	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO)
+		inten &= ~(TE_RDY_INT_FLAG | EXT_TE_RDY_INT_FLAG);
+
+	writel(inten, dsi->regs + DSI_INTEN);
+}
+
[snip...]
+
+static irqreturn_t mtk_dsi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = dev_id;
+	u32 status, tmp;
+	u32 flag = LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG | CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG | VM_DONE_INT_FLAG;
Why do you only process these three irq? You also enable TE_RDY_INT_FLAG
& EXT_TE_RDY_INT_FLAG in mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable(). Process these
two irq here or not enable them in mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable().

Regards,
CK
+
+	status = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA) & flag;
+
+	if (status) {
+		do {
+			mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_RACK, RACK, RACK);
+			tmp = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA);
+		} while (tmp & DSI_BUSY);
+
+		mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_INTSTA, status, 0);
+		mtk_dsi_irq_data_set(dsi, status);
+		wake_up_interruptible(&dsi->irq_wait_queue);
+	}
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help