ARM, SoC: About the use DT-defined properties by 3rd-party drivers

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:49:07AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:

Warner Losh wrote:

quoted

Do I have more examples
where FreeBSD has to deviate because the DT is actually Linux
specific and does a poor job of modeling the hardware and instead
reflects the Linux driver model? I have plenty of those...

I think it would be a great idea if the FreeBSD and Linux DT
maintainers collaborated on cleaning up the DT bindings so that this
problem no longer occurs (or at least, not normally).

Indeed. Theoretically/hopefully, the devicetree.org stuff creates a more
inclusive forum for this.

Thanks,
Mark.