Thread (28 messages) flat view 28 messages, 2 authors, 2016-09-14

[PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701

From: YT Shen <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-12 10:17:01
Also in: dri-devel, linux-mediatek, lkml

Hi CK,

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:37 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
Hi, YT:

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
quoted
This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.

Signed-off-by: YT Shen <redacted>
[snip...]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
index 4b4e449..465819b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct mtk_ddp_comp_match {
 
 static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL]	= { MTK_DISP_AAL,	0, NULL },
+	[DDP_COMPONENT_BLS]	= { MTK_DISP_PWM,	0, NULL },
I think BLS is different than PWM, so this statement should be

[DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_BLS, 0, NULL };
The BLS module actually is a multifunction device, one of them is the
PWM function.  We only upstream PWM function [1] now, and it is
accepted.  When there are real use case (gamma function), we will update
this part.  What do you think?

Regards,
yt.shen

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9223001/
quoted
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	0, &ddp_color },
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	1, &ddp_color },
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0]	= { MTK_DPI,		0, NULL },
Regards,
CK
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help