[RFC PATCH V5 1/5] PCI: Embed pci_ecam_ops in pci_config_window structure
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-02 15:38:44
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-pci, lkml
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:23:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:quoted
pci_config_window keeps pointer to pci_ecam_ops and every time we want to deallocate pci_config_window (pci_ecam_free()) we need to make sure to free pci_ecam_ops in case it was dynamically allocated prior to pci_ecam_create() call.I think this is a theoretical problem, right? All the current callers pass a pointer to a static pci_ecam_ops struct that does not need to be deallocated. I see that the next patch uses a pci_ecam_ops struct on the stack,
I asked Tomasz why we need to have pci_ecam_ops on the stack in the first place since I do not think it is needed, or nicer (actually I think it is not nice at all, what's the problem in making it static ?). Anyway, that's part of this thread but I think Tomasz was looking more for feedback/agreement on the whole quirks mechanism to check if it is fine, more below.
which would definitely cause issues without this patch, so I agree we need something like this; I'm just trying to make the changelog make more sense.quoted
To avoid that extra effort, embed pci_ecam_ops in pci_config_window, instead of just a pointer. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <redacted> To: Jayachandran C <redacted>This looks like an editing mistake?
Yes it is. I think the most important bit about this series is to agree on whether it is ok to keep quirks in drivers/pci/host/mcfg-quirks.c or we need to find a different dir for it, and of course to make sure the quirks mechanism is fine with everyone. Thanks ! Lorenzo
quoted
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/ecam.c | 6 +++--- include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c index acf3872..981e828 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) return NULL; } - acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; + acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops.pci_ops; bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg); if (!bus)diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c index 43ed08d..24242f0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c +++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct pci_config_window *pci_ecam_create(struct device *dev, return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); cfg->parent = dev; - cfg->ops = ops; + cfg->ops = *ops; cfg->busr.start = busr->start; cfg->busr.end = busr->end; cfg->busr.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where) { struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; - unsigned int devfn_shift = cfg->ops->bus_shift - 8; + unsigned int devfn_shift = cfg->ops.bus_shift - 8; unsigned int busn = bus->number; void __iomem *base;@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, if (per_bus_mapping) base = cfg->winp[busn]; else - base = cfg->win + (busn << cfg->ops->bus_shift); + base = cfg->win + (busn << cfg->ops.bus_shift); return base + (devfn << devfn_shift) + where; }diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h index 7adad20..0ce2920 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct pci_config_window { struct resource res; struct resource busr; void *priv; - struct pci_ecam_ops *ops; + struct pci_ecam_ops ops; union { void __iomem *win; /* 64-bit single mapping */ void __iomem **winp; /* 32-bit per-bus mapping */-- 1.9.1