On Wednesday 24 August 2016, Linus Walleij wrote:
+static void qcom_ebi2_setup_chipselect(struct device_node *np,
+ struct device *dev,
+ void __iomem *ebi2_base,
+ void __iomem *ebi2_xmem,
+ u32 csindex)
+{
+ const struct cs_data *csd;
+ u32 slowcfg, fastcfg;
+ u32 val;
+ int ret;
+ int i;
+
+ csd = &cs_info[csindex];
+ val = readl_relaxed(ebi2_base);
+ val |= csd->enable_mask;
+ writel_relaxed(val, ebi2_base);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "enabled CS%u\n", csindex);
better use readl/writel instead of *_relaxed() if it's not performance critical.
If you have a function that is worth optimizing with relaxed accessors, add a
comment about how your concluded that it's safe to do so.
+static struct platform_driver qcom_ebi2_driver = {
+ .probe = qcom_ebi2_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "qcom-ebi2",
+ .of_match_table = qcom_ebi2_of_match,
+ },
+};
+builtin_platform_driver(qcom_ebi2_driver);
Why not allow this to be a loadable module?
Arnd