Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-08-23

[PATCH 3/6] dt/bindings: Add bindings for Tegra GMI controller

From: Mirza Krak <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-23 10:33:09
Also in: linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-tegra

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2016-08-08 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jon Hunter [off-list ref]:
quoted
+
+  gmi at 70090000 {
+    #address-cells = <1>;
+    #size-cells = <1>;
I think 0 for size makes sense. I know that caused you problems before,
but I am wondering if ...
quoted
+    ranges;
... ranges is needed here? If we do have it, I am wondering if it should
be a single entry for the chip-select that is being used. For now we
could only support a ranges with one entry.

        #address-cells = <1>;
        #size-cells = <1>;
        ranges = <4 0x48000000 0x00040000>;
quoted
+    nvidia,snor-mux-mode;
+    nvidia,snor-adv-inv;
+    nvidia,snor-cs-select = <4>;
I would have expected these under bus at X node as they are specific to the
GMI CS.

I would also expect that the actual chip-select number is encoded in the
reg property.
quoted
+
+    bus at 0,0 {
bus at 4

No mention of this bus node in the above documentation.
quoted
+      compatible = "simple-bus";
+      reg = <0 0>;
reg = <4>;

We should look up the chip-select from the reg property.
quoted
+      ranges;
+
+      #address-cells = <1>;
+      #size-cells = <1>;
+
+      can at 48000000 {
+        reg = <0x48000000 0x100>;
+        ...
+      };
+
+      can at 48040000 {
+        reg = <0x48040000 0x100>;
+        ...
+      };
If we use ranges we could have ...

        can at 0 {
                reg = <0x0 0x100>;
                ...
        };

        can at 40000 {
                reg = <0x40000 0x100>;
                ...
        };
Hi.

Like we discussed I am now trying to implement this but without
success and I am starting to think that it is not that simple unless I
am missing something.

Below tree

gmi at 70009000 {
     status = "okay";
     #address-cells = <1>;
     #size-cells = <1>;
     ranges = <4 0x48000000 0x7ffffff>;

     bus at 4 {
          compatible = "simple-bus";
          reg = <4 0>;
          #address-cells = <1>;
          #size-cells = <1>;
         nvidia,snor-mux-mode;
         nvidia,snor-adv-inv;

        can at 0 {
              compatible = "nxp,sja1000";
              reg = <0 0x100>;
              ....
     };

     can at 40000 {
           compatible = "nxp,sja1000";
           reg = <0x40000 0x100>;
           ....
    };
};
};

results in:

[    8.472509]    create child: /gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0
[    8.472561] OF: ** translation for device /gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0 **
[    8.472577] OF: bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /gmi at 70009000/bus at 4
[    8.472589] OF: translating address: 00000000
[    8.472624] OF: parent bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /gmi at 70009000
[    8.472641] OF: no ranges; cannot translate
[    8.472668] of_irq_parse_one: dev=/gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0, index=0
[    8.472687]  intspec=13 intlen=2
[    8.472726]  intsize=2 intlen=2
[    8.472740] of_irq_parse_raw:  /gpio at 6000d000:0000000d,00000001
[    8.493718] of_irq_parse_raw: ipar=/gpio at 6000d000, size=2
[    8.493737]  -> addrsize=1
[    8.493743]  -> got it !
[    8.493755] of_irq_parse_one: dev=/gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0, index=1
[    8.493771]  intspec=13 intlen=2
[    8.493790]  intsize=2 intlen=2
[    8.493800] of_irq_parse_one: dev=/gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0, index=0
[    8.493805]  intspec=13 intlen=2
[    8.493812]  intsize=2 intlen=2
[    8.493824] of_irq_parse_raw:  /gpio at 6000d000:0000000d,00000001
[    8.493829] of_irq_parse_raw: ipar=/gpio at 6000d000, size=2
[    8.493834]  -> addrsize=1
[    8.493837]  -> got it !
[    8.493869] OF: ** translation for device /gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0 **
[    8.493885] OF: bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /gmi at 70009000/bus at 4
[    8.493892] OF: translating address: 00000000
[    8.493902] OF: parent bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /gmi at 70009000
[    8.493906] OF: no ranges; cannot translate
[    8.493918] OF: ** translation for device /gmi at 70009000/bus at 4 **
[    8.493924] OF: bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /gmi at 70009000
[    8.493930] OF: translating address: 00000004
[    8.493938] OF: parent bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /
[    8.493944] OF: walking ranges...
[    8.493952] OF: default map, cp=4, s=7ffffff, da=4
[    8.493973] OF: parent translation for: 48000000
[    8.493978] OF: with offset: 0
[    8.493986] OF: one level translation: 48000000
[    8.493989] OF: reached root node
[    8.494011] of_dma_get_range: no dma-ranges found for
node(/gmi at 70009000/bus at 4/can at 0)
[    8.494037] platform 48000000.bus:can at 0: device is not dma coherent
[    8.494048] platform 48000000.bus:can at 0: device is not behind an iommu
[    8.495209] sja1000 probe entered
[    8.495212] sja1000 probe entered1

sja1000 probe fails because resource address is NULL.

The result is the same for the second child device.

I also attempted to add "ranges;" property to the bus child node,
which results in the same error on can at 0, and can at 4000 is actually
translated but it is not what I expect it to be (0x4803fff8).

And I am not quite sure how to get around this in a simple way. I can
not wrap my head around how the ranges property actually works really.

Any suggestions would be really helpful.

Best Regards
Mirza
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help