[stable:PATCH 1/2] arm64: kernel: Save and restore addr_limit on exception entry
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-17 12:50:35
Also in:
stable
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 05:45:43PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
Hi Greg, On 14/08/16 16:54, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:11:19PM +0100, James Morse wrote:quoted
commit e19a6ee2460bdd0d0055a6029383422773f9999a upstream. If we take an exception while at EL1, the exception handler inherits the original context's addr_limit value. To be consistent always reset addr_limit and PSTATE.UAO on (re-)entry to EL1. This prevents accidental re-use of the original context's addr_limit. Based on a similar patch for arm from Russell King. Acked-by: Will Deacon <redacted> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <redacted> [ backport to stop perf misusing inherited addr_limit. Removed code interacting with UAO and the irqstack ] Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=822 Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: <redacted> #4.1Fails to apply to 4.4-stable, can you provide a backport for both of these to that tree if you want them there?Sorry - that is what I was trying to do! v4.4: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-August/448685.html v4.1 (this one): http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-August/448684.html Did I mess something up in the cc/sign-off area?
Ah, that was confusing. You sent 2 patches, as a series, and didn't make it obvious what they were to be applied to. Please make it so I can't miss it, otherwise I will :) now queued up. greg k-h