On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:05:06AM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2016, 08:59:31 schrieb Elaine Zhang:
quoted
On 08/30/2016 02:18 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:11:24AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
quoted
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
@@ -908,8 +908,8 @@
reg = <0x0 0xff750000 0x0 0x1000>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
- assigned-clocks = <&pmucru PLL_PPLL>;
- assigned-clock-rates = <676000000>;
+ assigned-clocks = <&pmucru PLL_PPLL>, <&pmucru PCLK_SRC_PMU>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <676000000>, <112666667>;
I think this makes sense and is a good idea. One alternative would be to
have the various children actually set a rate that they expect, but
several of them don't have a separate driver at all, and that would be
of dubious value anyway I think.
I agree with you. This clk default div is set in the uboot or coreboot.
And if is need to set in kernel ,I hope the freq is 50M(<48285714>).
This freq can meet the performance,and the power consumption is not too
much.
can you maybe also provide a tag like the one Brian did below. Your sentence
above indicates that you reviewed and approve, but it's helpful to also state
that explicitly :-)
If I understand Elaine correctly, that's not actually a full agreement;
it looks like a suggestion to change that from 112 MHz to 48.2 MHz. I
haven't tested that out personally yet, but if that's a formal
recommendation from Rockchip, we'd like to know more about it :)
Brian