[PATCH 2/2] clk: mvebu: dynamically allocate resources in Armada CP110 system controller
From: Marcin Wojtas <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-30 15:31:24
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
Hi Stephen, 2016-08-25 2:16 GMT+02:00 Stephen Boyd [off-list ref]:
On 08/23, Marcin Wojtas wrote:quoted
Original commit, which added support for Armada CP110 system controller used global variables for storing all clock information. It worked fine for Armada 7k SoC, with single CP110 block. After dual-CP110 Armada 8k was introduced, the data got overwritten and corrupted. This patch fixes the issue by allocating resources dynamically in the driver probe and storing it as platform drvdata. Fixes: d3da3eaef7f4 ("clk: mvebu: new driver for Armada CP110 system ...")Please drop the space between fixes tag and the signoff.
Ok.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <redacted> --- drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c index 0835e1d..2bd87d2 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c@@ -81,13 +81,6 @@ enum { #define CP110_GATE_EIP150 25 #define CP110_GATE_EIP197 26 -static struct clk *cp110_clks[CP110_CLK_NUM]; - -static struct clk_onecell_data cp110_clk_data = { - .clks = cp110_clks, - .clk_num = CP110_CLK_NUM, -}; - struct cp110_gate_clk { struct clk_hw hw; struct regmap *regmap;@@ -195,7 +188,8 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct regmap *regmap; struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; const char *ppv2_name, *apll_name, *core_name, *eip_name, *nand_name; - struct clk *clk; + struct clk_onecell_data *cp110_clk_data; + struct clk *clk, **cp110_clks; u32 nand_clk_ctrl; int i, ret;@@ -208,6 +202,20 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) return ret; + cp110_clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct clk *), + CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL); + if (IS_ERR(cp110_clks))Doesn't that return NULL on error?
Will change to 'if (!cp110clks)'
quoted
+ return PTR_ERR(cp110_clks); + + cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, + sizeof(struct clk_onecell_data),sizeof(*cp110_clk_data) please
Ok.
quoted
+ GFP_KERNEL); + if (IS_ERR(cp110_clk_data))Doesn't that return NULL on error?
Same as above, will change.
quoted
+ return PTR_ERR(cp110_clk_data); + + cp110_clk_data->clks = cp110_clks; + cp110_clk_data->clk_num = CP110_CLK_NUM; + /* Register the APLL which is the root of the clk tree */ of_property_read_string_index(np, "core-clock-output-names", CP110_CORE_APLL, &apll_name);@@ -335,10 +343,12 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) cp110_clks[CP110_MAX_CORE_CLOCKS + i] = clk; } - ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, cp110_of_clk_get, &cp110_clk_data); + ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, cp110_of_clk_get, cp110_clk_data);It would be nice if this could be converted to of_clk_add_hw_provider().
Will try it. Shouldn't such change be placed in separate commit?
quoted
if (ret) goto fail_clk_add; + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cp110_clks); + return 0; fail_clk_add:@@ -365,6 +375,7 @@ fail0: static int cp110_syscon_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct clk **cp110_clks = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);Is this variable unused now?
No, why? Just below there is a loop using it. Before it was taken from global variable, which I got rid of. Best regards, Marcin