[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Add MDM9615 dtsi
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-19 01:27:02
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 08/18, Neil Armstrong wrote:
+
+/dts-v1/;
+
+/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
+
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-mdm9615.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,gcc-mdm9615.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/mfd/qcom-rpm.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,gsbi.h>
+
+/ {
+ model = "Qualcomm MDM9615";
+ compatible = "qcom,mdm9615";
+ interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 0x304>;What's this interrupt for? 0x304 seems wrong as well, because 0x3 would mean two CPUs and this is a SPI and not a PPI?
+
+ cpu0: cpu at 0 {
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a5";
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ cpu-pmu {
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a5-pmu";
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 0x304>;
+ };
+
+ clocks {
+ cxo_board {
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <19200000>;
+ clock-output-names = "cxo_board";This is unnecessary as it's the same name as the node name.
+ };
+ };
+
+ soc: soc {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+ compatible = "simple-bus";
+
+ L2: l2-cache {
+ compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
+ reg = <0x02040000 0x1000>;
+ arm,data-latency = <2 2 0>;
+ cache-unified;
+ cache-level = <2>;
+ };
+
+ intc: interrupt-controller at 2000000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+ reg = <0x02000000 0x1000>,
+ <0x02002000 0x1000>;
+ };
+
+ timer at 200a000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,kpss-timer", "qcom,msm-timer";
+ interrupts = <GIC_PPI 1 0x301>,
+ <GIC_PPI 2 0x301>,
+ <GIC_PPI 3 0x301>;0x101 for all those flags?
+ reg = <0x0200a000 0x100>;
+ clock-frequency = <27000000>,
+ <32768>;
+ cpu-offset = <0x80000>;
+ };
+
+ msmgpio: pinctrl at 800000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,mdm9615-pinctrl", "syscon";What's the syscon for?
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ reg = <0x800000 0x4000>;
+ };
+
+ gcc: clock-controller at 900000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,gcc-mdm9615";
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ reg = <0x900000 0x4000>;
+ };
+
+ lcc: clock-controller at 28000000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,lcc-mdm9615";
+ reg = <0x28000000 0x1000>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ };
+
+ l2cc: clock-controller at 2011000 {
+ compatible = "syscon";
+ reg = <0x02011000 0x1000>;
+ };
+
+ rng at 1a500000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,prng";
+ reg = <0x1a500000 0x200>;
+ clocks = <&gcc PRNG_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core";
+ assigned-clocks = <&gcc PRNG_CLK>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <32000000>;
+ };
+
+ vsdcc_fixed: vsdcc-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "SDCC Power";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2700000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };This should go into the root under a "regulators" node.
+
+ gsbi2: gsbi at 16100000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,gsbi-v1.0.0";
+ cell-index = <2>;
+ reg = <0x16100000 0x100>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI2_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+
+ gsbi2_i2c: i2c at 16180000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x16180000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 149 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;There should be a trigger type... high perhaps?
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI2_QUP_CLK>, <&gcc GSBI2_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+ };
+
+ gsbi3: gsbi at 16200000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,gsbi-v1.0.0";
+ cell-index = <3>;
+ reg = <0x16200000 0x100>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI3_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+
+ gsbi3_spi: spi at 16280000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,spi-qup-v1.1.1";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x16280000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 151 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+ spi-max-frequency = <24000000>;
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI3_QUP_CLK>, <&gcc GSBI3_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+ };
+
+ gsbi4: gsbi at 16300000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,gsbi-v1.0.0";
+ cell-index = <4>;
+ reg = <0x16300000 0x100>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI4_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+
+ syscon-tcsr = <&tcsr>;
+
+ gsbi4_serial: serial at 16340000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.3", "qcom,msm-uartdm";
+ reg = <0x16340000 0x1000>,
+ <0x16300000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 152 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI4_UART_CLK>, <&gcc GSBI4_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+ };
+
+ gsbi5: gsbi at 16400000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,gsbi-v1.0.0";
+ cell-index = <5>;
+ reg = <0x16400000 0x100>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI5_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+
+ syscon-tcsr = <&tcsr>;
+
+ gsbi5_i2c: i2c at 16480000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x16480000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 155 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+
+ /* QUP clock is not initialized, set rate */
+ assigned-clocks = <&gcc GSBI5_QUP_CLK>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI5_QUP_CLK>, <&gcc GSBI5_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ gsbi5_serial: serial at 16440000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.3", "qcom,msm-uartdm";
+ reg = <0x16440000 0x1000>,
+ <0x16400000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 154 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GSBI5_UART_CLK>, <&gcc GSBI5_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+ };
+
+ qcom,ssbi at 500000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,ssbi";
+ reg = <0x500000 0x1000>;
+ qcom,controller-type = "pmic-arbiter";
+
+ pmicintc: pmic at 0 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8018", "qcom,pm8921";I know that DT specifies most specific compatible first, but when the generic compatible is part number specific as well it never feels right to me. I guess I'll have to get over this.
+ interrupts = <GIC_PPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>;
Can we have interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc> here instead of in every node?
+
+ pwrkey at 1c {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8018-pwrkey", "qcom,pm8921-pwrkey";
+ reg = <0x1c>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
+ interrupts = <50 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <51 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ debounce = <15625>;
+ pull-up;
+ };
+
+ pmicmpp: mpp at 50 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8018-mpp";
+ interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
+ interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <25 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;We've recently been reminded that these should all be IRQ_TYPE_NONE. Also add the qcom,ssbi-mpp compatible please.
+ reg = <0x50>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ };
+
+ rtc at 11d {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8018-rtc", "qcom,pm8921-rtc";
+ interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
+ interrupts = <39 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ reg = <0x11d>;
+ allow-set-time;
+ };
+
+ pmicgpio: gpio at 150 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8018-gpio";
+ interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
+ interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <25 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;Same IRQ_TYPE_NONE comment. Also, add the qcom,ssbi-gpio compatible please.
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ sdcc1bam:dma at 12182000{
Add some space here:
sdcc1bam: dma at 12180000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.3.0";
+ reg = <0x12182000 0x8000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 98 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+ clocks = <&gcc SDC1_H_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "bam_clk";
+ #dma-cells = <1>;
+ qcom,ee = <0>;
+ };
+
+ sdcc2bam:dma at 12142000{ditto.
+ compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.3.0"; + reg = <0x12142000 0x8000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
There should really be some flags.
+ clocks = <&gcc SDC2_H_CLK>; + clock-names = "bam_clk"; + #dma-cells = <1>; + qcom,ee = <0>; + }; +
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project