[PATCH 4/8] arm64: insn: Add helpers for adrp offsets
flat view
From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
Date: 2016-08-19 00:57:03
Also in:
lkml
On 18/08/16 15:47, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Suzuki, On 18/08/16 14:10, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:quoted
Adds helpers for decoding/encoding the PC relative addresses for adrp. This will be used for handling dynamic patching of 'adrp' instructions in alternative code patching. Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <redacted> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 4 ++++ arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h index 1dbaa90..dffb0364 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_get_##abbr##_value(void) \ { return (val); } __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(adr_adrp, 0x1F000000, 0x10000000) +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(adrp, 0x9F000000, 0x90000000)I'm a bit bothered by this one. We end-up with both aarch64_insn_is_adr_adrp() *and* aarch64_insn_is_adrp() (and their respective getters).
You're right. It doesn't look good.
How about dropping adr_adrp, and explicitly having adr and adrp? There is only two users in the tree, so that should be easy to address.
Sounds good, will update if for v2. Cheers Suzuki