Hi Timur,

On 18 August 2016 at 03:01, Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:

Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

quoted

I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64
directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on
the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning
out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created
in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of
Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull
request.

If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes,
you can proceed as above.

What's the latest on this patchset?  I really want them in 4.9.  Is
everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved.

we are trying to let Tomasz's series be merged first, then this patch set
will be rebased on the top of it.

If everyone is OK with this patchset, I guess  "in 4.9" is not a problem.

I don't see any suggestion and comment for now, will keep my eyes on it.

Who will be merging these patches?

I think the clocksource maintainer will take care of it, and  GTDT patch
has got Rafael's ACK.

--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat