Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 5 authors, 2016-08-11

[RFC PATCH v3 13/13] drivers: acpi: iort: introduce iort_iommu_configure

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 08:45:01
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-iommu, linux-pci, lkml

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:19:43AM -0400, nwatters at codeaurora.org wrote:

[...]
quoted
+const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct acpi_iort_node *node, *parent;
+	struct fwnode_handle *iort_fwnode;
+	u32 rid = 0, devid = 0;
Since this routine maps the RID space of a device to the StreamID
space of its
parent smmu, would you consider renaming the devid variable to some
form of sid
or streamid?
quoted
+
+	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
+		struct pci_bus *bus = to_pci_dev(dev)->bus;
+
+		pci_for_each_dma_alias(to_pci_dev(dev), __get_pci_rid,
+				       &rid);
+
+		node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX,
+				      iort_match_node_callback, &bus->dev);
+	} else {
+		node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT,
+				      iort_match_node_callback, dev);
+	}
+
+	if (!node)
+		return NULL;
+
+	parent = iort_node_map_rid(node, rid, &devid, IORT_IOMMU_TYPE);
+	if (parent) {
+		iort_fwnode = iort_get_fwnode(parent);
+		if (iort_fwnode) {
+			arm_smmu_iort_xlate(dev, devid, iort_fwnode);
What about named components with multiple stream ids? Since
establishing the relationship between a named component and its parent
smmu is already dependent on there being an appropriate mapping of rid
0, it stands to reason that all of the stream ids for a named
component could be enumerated by mapping increasing rid values until
the output parent no longer matches that returned for rid 0.
I have reworked the code since for named component it makes no
sense to carry out a mapping that depends on an input id given
that we do not have one. Instead what we will do is the same
thing DT does (ie "iommus" property), namely walk the array of
single mappings for a given named component (that do not depend
on the input rid, there is not any) and add them to the translation
as we find them.

Ergo, mappings that are not single mappings are pretty much useless
for named components (for the time being), and I won't allow them.

Thoughts ?

Lorenzo
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
quoted
+			return fwspec_iommu_get_ops(iort_fwnode);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
It should be noted that while trying out the approach described
above, I noticed
that each of the smmu attached named components described in my iort
were ending
up with an extra stream id. The culprit appears to be that the range
checking in
iort_id_map() is overly permissive on the upper bounds. For example,
mappings
with input_base=N and id_count=1 were matching both N and N+1. The
following
change fixed the issue.
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ iort_id_map(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *map, u8
type, u32 rid_in, u32 *rid_out)
        }

        if (rid_in < map->input_base ||
-           (rid_in > map->input_base + map->id_count))
+           (rid_in >= map->input_base + map->id_count))
                return -ENXIO;

        *rid_out = map->output_base + (rid_in - map->input_base);
quoted
+
static void acpi_smmu_v3_register_irq(int hwirq, const char *name,
				      struct resource *res)
{
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index b4b9064..de28825 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/iort.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
@@ -1365,11 +1366,15 @@ enum dev_dma_attr acpi_get_dma_attr(struct
acpi_device *adev)
 */
void acpi_dma_configure(struct device *dev, enum dev_dma_attr attr)
{
+	const struct iommu_ops *iommu;
+
+	iommu = iort_iommu_configure(dev);
+
	/*
	 * Assume dma valid range starts at 0 and covers the whole
	 * coherent_dma_mask.
	 */
-	arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1, NULL,
+	arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1, iommu,
			   attr == DEV_DMA_COHERENT);
If dev has a matching named component iort entry with a non-zero
value for
memory_address_limit, why not use that as the size input to
arch_setup_dma_ops?
quoted
}
diff --git a/include/linux/iort.h b/include/linux/iort.h
index 18e6836..bbe08ef 100644
--- a/include/linux/iort.h
+++ b/include/linux/iort.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct
device *dev, u32 req_id);
/* IOMMU interface */
int iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
				  struct acpi_iort_node *node);
+
+const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev);
#else
static inline bool iort_node_match(u8 type) { return false; }
static inline void iort_table_detect(void) { }
@@ -48,6 +50,8 @@ iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct
fwnode_handle *fwnode,
{
	return -ENODEV;
}
+static inline const struct iommu_ops *
+iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev) { return NULL; }
#endif

#define IORT_ACPI_DECLARE(name, table_id, fn)		\
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help