[PATCH v5 5/6] usb: chipidea: let chipidea core device of_node equal's glue layer device of_node
From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-10 20:13:36
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:00:15AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
Hi, Peterquoted
-----Original Message----- From: linux-usb-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-usb- owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter Chen Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:12 AM To: Stephen Boyd <redacted> Cc: Peter Chen <redacted>; gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; stern at rowland.harvard.edu; ulf.hansson at linaro.org; broonie at kernel.org; sre at kernel.org; robh+dt at kernel.org; shawnguo at kernel.org; dbaryshkov at gmail.com; dwmw3 at infradead.org; k.kozlowski at samsung.com; linux- arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; p.zabel at pengutronix.de; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; pawel.moll at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com; linux-usb at vger.kernel.org; arnd at arndb.de; s.hauer at pengutronix.de; mail at maciej.szmigiero.name; troy.kisky at boundarydevices.com; festevam at gmail.com; oscar at naiandei.net; linux-pm at vger.kernel.org; stillcompiling at gmail.com; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; mka at chromium.org; Peter Chen [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] usb: chipidea: let chipidea core device of_node equal's glue layer device of_node On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:15:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
Quoting Peter Chen (2016-08-08 01:52:10)quoted
From: Peter Chen <redacted> At device tree, we have no device node for chipidea core, the glue layer's node is the parent node for host and udc device. But in related driver, the parent device is chipidea core. So, in order to let the common driver get parent's node, we let the core's device node equals glue layer device node. Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted> Tested-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <redacted> Tested-by Joshua Clayton [off-list ref] --- drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.cb/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c index 69426e6..b189dc7 100644--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c@@ -954,6 +954,15 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
quoted
dev_err(dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret); return ret; } + /* + * At device tree, we have no device node for chipidea core, + * the glue layer's node is the parent node for host and udc + * device. But in related driver, the parent device ischipideaquoted
quoted
+ * core. So, in order to let the common driver get parent'snode,quoted
quoted
+ * we let the core's device node equals glue layer's node. + */ + if (dev->parent && dev->parent->of_node) + dev->of_node = dev->parent->of_node;Can this be done earlier? Perhaps after hw_device_init() in this probe routine? That would allow me to remove the awkward parent searching in my ULPI DT awareness patch.The reason why I locate it there is to avoid "goto label" for error path during PHY's get and initialization operation. Ok, to simplify your work, I will change it at next version.As iommu need this to be done even more earlier, will you consider to put it before adding the core's platform device?
I can't do it, it will introduce another issue that the pinctrl has already requested by parents. The warning is similar like below, but occurs at the probe. http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1607.2/03150.html I will see how iommu support can be added for platform devices which are created by runtime (like chipidea core device). -- Best Regards, Peter Chen