[PATCH] Added perf functionality to mmdc driver
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2016-08-05 15:03:42
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:25AM -0500, Zhengyu Shen wrote:
$ perf stat -e mmdc/busy-cycles/,mmdc/read-accesses/,mmdc/read-bytes/,mmdc/total-cycles/,mmdc/write-accesses/,mmdc/write-bytes/ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5000
Performance counter stats for 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5000':
898021787 mmdc/busy-cycles/
14819600 mmdc/read-accesses/
471.30 MB mmdc/read-bytes/
2815419216 mmdc/total-cycles/
13367354 mmdc/write-accesses/
427.76 MB mmdc/write-bytes/
5.334757334 seconds time elapsedAs Peter noted, you must better describe this, e.g. * What is the MMDC (it appears to be a DRAM controller?) * Which devices have this? * What types of event does it support? * Does it have many cuonters? How wide are they? Is there an overflow interrupt? * Who is this useful for? Generally, this looks far from complete, though it's difficult to tell what the driver should be doing, given the lack of information. Comments below. [...]
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(total-cycles, evattr_total_cycles, "event=0x01")
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(busy-cycles, evattr_busy_cycles, "event=0x02")
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(read-accesses, evattr_read_accesses, "event=0x03")
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(write-accesses, evattr_write_accesses, "config=0x04")
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(read-bytes, evattr_read_bytes, "event=0x05")
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(read-bytes.unit, evattr_read_bytes_unit, "MB");
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(read-bytes.scale, evattr_read_bytes_scale, "0.000001");
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(write-bytes, evattr_write_bytes, "event=0x06")
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(write-bytes.unit, evattr_write_bytes_unit, "MB");
+PMU_EVENT_ATTR_STRING(write-bytes.scale, evattr_write_bytes_scale, "0.000001");
+
+struct mmdc_pmu
+{
+ struct pmu pmu;
+ void __iomem *mmdc_base;
+};
+
+static struct attribute *events_attrs[] = {
+ &evattr_total_cycles.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_busy_cycles.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_read_accesses.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_write_accesses.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_read_bytes.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_read_bytes_unit.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_read_bytes_scale.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_write_bytes.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_write_bytes_unit.attr.attr,
+ &evattr_write_bytes_scale.attr.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-63");
+static struct attribute *format_attrs[] = {
+ &format_attr_event.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group format_attr_group = {
+ .name = "format",
+ .attrs = format_attrs,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group events_attr_group = {
+ .name = "events",
+ .attrs = events_attrs,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group * attr_groups[] = {
+ &events_attr_group,
+ &format_attr_group,
+ NULL,
+};This is an uncore PMU. You need a cpumask file, along with migration handling. See drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c for an example.
+static int mmdc_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u64 val;
+ if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
+ return -ENOENT;You *must* validate the event here. Check the config, grouping, filtering options, etc.
+ mmdc_enable_profiling(event); + val = mmdc_read_counter(event); + local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
Are the counters not writable?
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mmdc_event_update(struct perf_event * event)
+{
+ u64 val;
+ val = mmdc_read_counter(event);
+ local64_set(&event->count, val);
+}What about prev_count?
+static void mmdc_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+{
+ mmdc_event_update(event);
+}Huh? Are the counters always-running, with no mechanism to start/stop them? If so, you must reject event groups, as ratios will be bogus.
+static int mmdc_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+{
+ if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
+ mmdc_event_start(event, flags);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mmdc_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+{
+ mmdc_event_update(event);
+}
+
+static void mmdc_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+{
+ mmdc_event_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
+}
+
+static void mmdc_pmu_init(struct mmdc_pmu *pmu_mmdc, void __iomem *mmdc_base)
+{
+ *pmu_mmdc = (struct mmdc_pmu) {
+ .pmu = (struct pmu) {
+ .task_ctx_nr = perf_sw_context,NAK. This is *not* a softwre PMU. This is a system/uncore PMU, and should use perf_invalid_context.
+ .attr_groups = attr_groups, + .event_init = mmdc_event_init, + .add = mmdc_event_add, + .del = mmdc_event_del, + .start = mmdc_event_start, + .stop = mmdc_event_stop, + .read = mmdc_event_update, + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT,
This avoids sampling events, but you still need to poll to account for overflow.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ }, + .mmdc_base = mmdc_base, + }; +} + static int imx_mmdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; void __iomem *mmdc_base, *reg; + struct mmdc_pmu *pmu_mmdc; u32 val; int timeout = 0x400;@@ -61,7 +249,22 @@ static int imx_mmdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) __func__); return -EBUSY; } + pmu_mmdc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmdc_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
Nit: use sizeof(*pmu_mmdc)
+ if (!pmu_mmdc) {
+ pr_err("failed to allocate PMU device!\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ mmdc_pmu_init(pmu_mmdc, mmdc_base);
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu_mmdc);
+ perf_pmu_register(&(pmu_mmdc->pmu), "mmdc", -1);
+ return 0;
+}Thanks, Mark.