Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 3 authors, 2016-07-07
STALE3685d

Revision v21 of 4 in this series.

Revisions (4)
  1. v21 [diff vs current]
  2. v21 [diff vs current]
  3. v21 [diff vs current]
  4. v21 current

[PATCH v21 3/8] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown()

From: geoff@infradead.org (Geoff Levand)
Date: 2016-07-07 16:42:34
Also in: kexec

Hi,

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 09:43 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:28:57AM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:52 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
quoted
@@ -830,6 +855,14 @@ void handle_IPI(int ipinr, struct pt_regs
*regs)
 > > > > 	> > > > > > > 	> > > > irq_exit();
 > > > > 	> > > > > > > 	> > > > break;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
+> > > > 	> > > > case IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP:
+> > > > 	> > > > > > > 	> > > > irq_enter();
+> > > > 	> > > > > > > 	> > > > ipi_cpu_crash_stop(cpu, regs);
+
+> > > > 	> > > > > > > 	> > > > unreachable();
+#endif
It seems like you could simplifiy with something like:

	> > case IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP:
	> > 	> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) {
	> > 	> > 	> > irq_enter();
	> > 	> > 	> > ipi_cpu_crash_stop(cpu, regs);
	> > 	> > 	> > unreachable();
	> > 	> > }
OK, I will take this.
quoted
Then move the CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE conditional around
ipi_cpu_crash_stop to just around crash_save_cpu().
Yeah, we can do that, but I added these conditionals just because
the kernel size can be reduced (a bit, obviously) if kexec is
not needed.
The linker will remove the unused ipi_cpu_crash_stop since
it is static.  atomic_t waiting_for_crash_ipi also becomes
unused, and I think it will be removed also.  The motivation
for these changes is to get a build test of this code
even when CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=n.

-Geoff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help