[PATCH v4 4/7] rtc: ac100: Add clk output support
From: mturquette@baylibre.com (Michael Turquette)
Date: 2016-07-22 00:24:54
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-rtc
Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2016-07-13 20:34:34)
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Michael Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2016-06-30 08:58:48)quoted
+static long ac100_clkout_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, + unsigned long prate) +{ + unsigned long best_rate = 0, tmp_rate, tmp_prate; + int i; + + if (prate == AC100_RTC_32K_RATE) + return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &prate, NULL, + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH, + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO); + + for (i = 0; ac100_clkout_prediv[i].div; i++) { + tmp_prate = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, ac100_clkout_prediv[i].val); + tmp_rate = divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &tmp_prate, NULL, + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH, + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO); + + if (tmp_rate > rate) + continue; + if (rate - tmp_rate < best_rate - tmp_rate) + best_rate = tmp_rate; + } + + return best_rate; +} + +static int ac100_clkout_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + struct clk_hw *best_parent; + unsigned long best = 0; + int i, num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); + + for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) { + struct clk_hw *parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, i); + unsigned long tmp, prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent); + + tmp = ac100_clkout_round_rate(hw, req->rate, prate); + + if (tmp > req->rate) + continue; + if (req->rate - tmp < req->rate - best) { + best = tmp; + best_parent = parent; + } + } + + if (!best) + return -EINVAL; + + req->best_parent_hw = best_parent; + req->best_parent_rate = best; + req->rate = best; + + return 0; +}You only need one of the two functions above. Keep the .determine_rate callback and drop .round_rate.Only .round_rate is set in the clk_ops. ac100_clkout_round_rate just serves to split out some of the calculations done per parent.
If you only use .round_rate, shouldn't you drop .determine_rate then? Regards, Mike
quoted
Otherwise the rest of the clk support looks great to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>Thanks! ChenYu