[Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix three implicit module use cases fed via gpio] On 23/07/2016 (Sat 10:09) Robert Jarzmik wrote:

Paul Gortmaker [off-list ref] writes:

[...]

quoted

But with ARM and GPIO being different subsystems, we'll need to get
this in ARM 1st, and then wait a release before changing the GPIO
header, otherwise we'll risk triggering these three build failures.

So, if folks consider these three trivial changes OK for late in the
for-4.8 cycle, then great.  Otherwise I'll resubmit the ARM parts for
for-4.9 and the GPIO bits for the one after that.

[...]

Hi Paul,

I'll take the mach-pxa changes to pxa/for-next tree with Linus's ack.
Tony, I think you will carry the remaining omap2 one, right ?

As for the cycle, I'd prefer have it for-4.9 as we're at rc7 and it's a bit late
for me. If you want your GPIO bits to get in 4.9 I think I can commit to request
pull very early (-rc1 time) or give my ack so that Linus can carry these changes
through the gpio tree with the other changes.

Yep, agreed it is now (Sat) a bit late, so as per what I said above, do
whatever you are comfortable with and I'll react accordingly to make
sure the gpio fix lands on a baseline with all the other three patches
present and doesn't introduce build regressions.

Thanks,
Paul.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert