[PATCH 2/2] PCI: designware: let dw_pcie_link_up() beware of LTSSM training bit
From: Jisheng Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-18 02:43:31
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
Dear Joao, On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:10:24 +0100 Joao Pinto wrote:
Hi, On 7/6/2016 11:59 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:quoted
The link may be UP but still in link training. In this case, we can't think the link is up and operating correctly. So we need to teach dw_pcie_link_up() beware of the PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_IN_TRAINING bit. This patch also rewrite PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_UP definition so that it's consistent with other MACROS. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <redacted> --- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c index 9df879a..29e10dd 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ /* PCIe Port Logic registers */ #define PLR_OFFSET 0x700 #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1 (PLR_OFFSET + 0x2c) -#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_UP 0x00000010 +#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_UP (0x1 << 4) +#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_IN_TRAINING (0x1 << 29)According to the databook bit 29 is inside a range that is dedicated to M-PCIe. Have you checked bit 29 state by experience?
bit 29 here is bit 61 of cxpl_debug_info(64bit) in databook, the debug info is composited by debug 0 and debug 1 registers. I checked databook 4.3 and 4.21, bit 29 (bit 61 in databook) isn't dedicated to M-PCIe. I think you may misread the bit 29 here as the bit29 in databook? Databook indeed mentioned that bit[31:28] is reserved for M-PCIe And after more code checking, I think this is not only marvell have this case(link is up but still in link training), but pci-imx6.c also has this case, we could check imx6_pcie_link_up() for reference. Thanks, Jisheng
quoted
/* Parameters for the waiting for link up routine */ #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES 10@@ -417,7 +418,8 @@ int dw_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp) return pp->ops->link_up(pp); val = readl(pp->dbi_base + PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1); - return val & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_UP; + return ((val & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_UP) && + (!(val & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_IN_TRAINING))); } static int dw_pcie_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,Thanks, Joao