[PATCH v7 5/9] MAINTAINERS / ACPI: add the ARM64-specific ACPI Support maintainers
From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: 2016-07-13 20:17:08
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml
From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: 2016-07-13 20:17:08
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Fu Wei <redacted> This patch add the ARM64-specific ACPI Support maintainers in MAINTAINERS, according to the discussion on mailing list: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/29/580 Lorenzo Pieralisi will submit the pull requsts. The maintainers are listed by the alphabet order of their name. Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <redacted> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <redacted> --- MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1209323..1e03463 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS@@ -315,6 +315,14 @@ W: https://01.org/linux-acpi S: Supported F: drivers/acpi/fan.c +ACPI FOR ARM64 (ACPI/arm64) +M: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> +M: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> +M: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> +L: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/acpi/arm64 + ACPI THERMAL DRIVER M: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> L: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org --
This patch should not be part of your series. I would prefer it if Hanjun, Lorenzo or Sudeep sent it. Of course, it doesn't make much sense to send it before creating drivers/acpi/arm64/ and putting something in there, so it should be sent separately after the series has been merged. Thanks, Rafael