On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:56:23AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:

quoted

Replace unit address from 0 to the proper physical address. Also insure
that the unit address matches the reg property address.

Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I applied this long ago but never let you know: Applied, thanks.

Actually I didn't. And it seems the reason is that it doesn't apply
cleanly. For some reason my tree doesn't have an entry for the ecap
example on am437x. Am I missing a patch? Can you resend whatever is
not in linux-next yet?

Oh, nevermind my blabbering, it took me too long to realize that this is
the series that Tony had picked up for the most part, and I hadn't
properly marked it done in patchwork.

I'll go get some coffee now.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160711/45d4cb0b/attachment-0001.sig>