[PATCH v20 00/14] arm64 kexec kernel patches

Hi Catalin,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:00:39PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

Hi Geoff,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:54:47PM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote:

quoted

AKASHI Takahiro (7):
      arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
      arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory
      arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown()
      arm64: kdump: add kdump support
      arm64: kdump: add VMCOREINFO's for user-space coredump tools
      arm64: kdump: enable kdump in the arm64 defconfig
      arm64: kdump: update a kernel doc

Geoff Levand (4):
      arm64: Add back cpu reset routines
      arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support
      arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig
      arm64/kexec: Add pr_debug output

James Morse (3):
      arm64: hibernate: Don't hibernate on systems with stuck CPUs
      arm64: smp: Add function to determine if cpus are stuck in the kernel
      Documentation: dt: usable-memory and elfcorehdr nodes for arm64 kexec

I dropped patch 1 (hibernate), cherry-picked patch 2 from mainline
("cpus stuck in the kernel", already pushed by Will to 4.7-rc5) and
merged patches 3-6, with the amendments that James mentioned.

The kdump patches, including the "Documentation" one from James require
more review, testing and acks by the corresponding maintainers (kdump,
DT).

I see what you mean, but even for Geoff's kexec part, the maintainer
(Eric) have not given his ack.

You also don't seem to have added a s-o-b for those patches (since
you are submitting them; unless you plan to let Akashi-san submit them
in the future).

Basically Geoff has not reviewed nor tested kdump part, and
so I'm not sure that adding his s-o-b is appropriate.
Anyhow, I will post my future version of kdump by myself as
kexec has been queued in for-next/core.

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin