Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15
STALE3733d

Revision v1 of 4 in this series.

Revisions (4)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v1 current
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 7/8] arm64: pmu: Enable multiple PMUs in an ACPI system

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 13:22:46
Also in: linux-acpi

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:23:32PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Its possible that an ACPI system has multiple CPU types in it
with differing PMU counters. Use the newly provided acpi_pmu routines
to detect that case, and instantiate more than one set of counters.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <redacted>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c      |  7 +++-
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 865a9db..97007ec 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -1049,7 +1049,12 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		if (!ret)
 			ret = init_fn(pmu);
 	} else {
-		ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table, read_cpuid_id());
+		if (acpi_disabled) {
+			/* use the current cpu. */
+			ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table,
+					     read_cpuid_id());
+		} else
+			ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table, pdev->id);
 	}
 
 	if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index a257fc0..8f9bea3 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct pmu_types {
[...]
+	pmus = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(struct pmu_types),
+		       GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (pmus) {
+		arm_pmu_acpi_determine_cpu_types(pmus);
+
+		for (j = 0; pmus[j].cpu_count; j++) {
+			pr_devel("CPU type %X, count %d\n", pmus[j].cpu_type,
+				 pmus[j].cpu_count);
+			res = kcalloc(pmus[j].cpu_count,
+				      sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
Given that you already have dynamic allocation in here, why not use a
linked-list for the pmus list, and avoid having a potentially huge temporary
data structure?

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help