[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

Subsystems: the rest

STALE3732d

9 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-16 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-07 09:39:25

The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested
the performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows
no difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
 		};
 
 		pcie: pcie at 0x01000000 {
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: 2016-06-11 11:57:33

+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted hunk
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested
the performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows
no difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that
kernel is booted as non-secure.

Shawn

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/471026
 		};
 
 		pcie: pcie at 0x01000000 {
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-13 09:15:09

 
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for
pl310

+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested the
performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows no
difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that kernel is booted
as non-secure.

Shawn

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/471026
Add another Lucas in case he changed his email.

Shawn, do you know what his mean? Why other pl310 parameters can be changed in kernel?

Peter

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach)
Date: 2016-06-13 09:24:01

Am Samstag, den 11.06.2016, 19:57 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested
the performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows
no difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that
kernel is booted as non-secure.
My objection to this change still stands. Configuring the L2C to be
compliant to the ARMv7 ARM is at the same level as the CPU workarounds
that can not be applied in secure mode. Those must be done in the
firmware, if your firmware doesn't do it it's plain broken.

Regards,
Lucas

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-13 09:42:19

 
Am Samstag, den 11.06.2016, 19:57 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
quoted
+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested the
performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows no
difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that
kernel is booted as non-secure.
My objection to this change still stands. Configuring the L2C to be compliant to the
ARMv7 ARM is at the same level as the CPU workarounds that can not be applied in
secure mode. Those must be done in the firmware, if your firmware doesn't do it it's
plain broken.
Sorry, I not understand what's your mean. We only changes L2 configuration when the
cache is disabled, what problem will be?

Peter

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach)
Date: 2016-06-13 11:14:58

Am Montag, den 13.06.2016, 09:42 +0000 schrieb Peter Chen:
 
quoted
Am Samstag, den 11.06.2016, 19:57 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
quoted
+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested the
performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows no
difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that
kernel is booted as non-secure.
My objection to this change still stands. Configuring the L2C to be compliant to the
ARMv7 ARM is at the same level as the CPU workarounds that can not be applied in
secure mode. Those must be done in the firmware, if your firmware doesn't do it it's
plain broken.
Sorry, I not understand what's your mean. We only changes L2 configuration when the
cache is disabled, what problem will be?
If the kernel is booted in non-secure mode, the L2 cache configuration
register is RO and the kernel will crash on the attempt to write into
this register.

Regards,
Lucas

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-14 01:30:29

 
Am Montag, den 13.06.2016, 09:42 +0000 schrieb Peter Chen:
quoted
quoted
Am Samstag, den 11.06.2016, 19:57 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
quoted
+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1]
with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the
customer reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have
tested the performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit,
it shows no difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that
kernel is booted as non-secure.
My objection to this change still stands. Configuring the L2C to be
compliant to the
ARMv7 ARM is at the same level as the CPU workarounds that can not be
applied in secure mode. Those must be done in the firmware, if your
firmware doesn't do it it's plain broken.
Sorry, I not understand what's your mean. We only changes L2
configuration when the cache is disabled, what problem will be?
If the kernel is booted in non-secure mode, the L2 cache configuration register is RO
and the kernel will crash on the attempt to write into this register.
Does that mean current mainline kernel for imx6qdl can't boot with non-secure mode, I see other
L2 configurations have been changed like "arm, tag-latency" and "arm,data-latency"? Did you try it?

Peter 

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach)
Date: 2016-06-14 10:11:38

Hi Peter,

Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2016, 01:30 +0000 schrieb Peter Chen:
 
quoted
Am Montag, den 13.06.2016, 09:42 +0000 schrieb Peter Chen:
quoted
quoted
Am Samstag, den 11.06.2016, 19:57 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
quoted
+ Lucas

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
quoted
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1]
with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the
customer reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have
tested the performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit,
it shows no difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index ed613eb..30e21ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
 			cache-level = <2>;
 			arm,tag-latency = <4 2 3>;
 			arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
+			arm,shared-override;
Lucas had an objection to the change [1], considering the case that
kernel is booted as non-secure.
My objection to this change still stands. Configuring the L2C to be
compliant to the
ARMv7 ARM is at the same level as the CPU workarounds that can not be
applied in secure mode. Those must be done in the firmware, if your
firmware doesn't do it it's plain broken.
Sorry, I not understand what's your mean. We only changes L2
configuration when the cache is disabled, what problem will be?
If the kernel is booted in non-secure mode, the L2 cache configuration register is RO
and the kernel will crash on the attempt to write into this register.
Does that mean current mainline kernel for imx6qdl can't boot with non-secure mode, I see other
L2 configurations have been changed like "arm, tag-latency" and "arm,data-latency"? Did you try it?
I've just re-read the code and hereby withdraw my objection.

The cache configuration registers will only be touched if the DT
specified values differ from what the firmware has set up already. As
not setting the "shared-override" bit render the platform non compliant
to the ARMv7 ARM, one should hope that any firmware booting the kernel
in secure mode has already set this bit. The crash that will happen
otherwise might be just as good as the silent data corruption resulting
from not setting this bit.

Regards,
Lucas

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi: add "arm, shared-override" for pl310

From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: 2016-06-16 01:02:09

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
The imx6 SMP system has the same DMA memory coherency issue [1] with
pl310 L2 controller. With this shared override bit set, the customer
reports the DMA coherency issue is gone. Besides, I have tested
the performance using USB ethernet with/without this bit, it shows
no difference.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/469362/

Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <redacted>
Applied, thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help