Hi Igor,

On 06/05/2016 06:25 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:

Hi Christopher,

Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

On 06/02/2016 01:47 PM, Christopher Spinrath wrote:

quoted

Hi Igor,

On 05/29/2016 10:01 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:

quoted

On 05/27/2016 01:20 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:

quoted

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Christopher Spinrath
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Thanks for joining this discussion. I *guess* the rationale is to share
the same device tree with projects that are incompatible with the GPL
(e.g. *BSD). Even if there is no support for a particular device/board
having all (or most) files dual licensed makes it easier to just pull
them all in.

Yes, that's correct.

Thanks for the explanation.

Have you/CompuLab made a decision? Do you/CompuLab approve the dual license?

Yes, please use the dual license.
You can count this answer official.

Thank you very much! I will send v2 later today with the dual license
(and also changing the license of the cm-fx6 file).

I would be very nice, if you could provide your Acked-By (or whatever)
for the license changes (I will keep you in cc).

Cheers,
Christopher