Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 3 authors, 2016-10-18

[PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence

From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: 2016-06-29 21:40:53
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, lkml

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Sinan Kaya [off-list ref] wrote:
On 6/29/2016 5:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Sinan Kaya [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 6/29/2016 9:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <redacted>
Well, this is a rather obvious one, so I'm wondering why it is the
last one in the series?
The first three are more relevant to each other. It makes easy to
correlate the changes.
But this one doesn't seem to depend on them and it could be applied
without them, right?
Sure. It has no dependency.
OK

I've queued up this one.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help