[PATCH net-next 6/9] net: hns: normalize two different loop
From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
Date: 2016-06-27 11:49:29
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
Date: 2016-06-27 11:49:29
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 17:54 +0800, Yisen Zhuang wrote:
From: Daode Huang <redacted> There are two approaches to assign data, one does 2 loops, another does 1 loop. This patch normalize the different methods to 1 loop.
[]
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c
[]
@@ -2567,15 +2567,15 @@ static char *hns_dsaf_get_node_stats_strings(char *data, int node,? buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; ? if (node < DSAF_SERVICE_NW_NUM && !is_ver1) { ? for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { - snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, - ?"inod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", node, i); - buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; - } - for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { - snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, - ?"onod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", node, i); + snprintf(buff + 0 * ETH_GSTRING_LEN * DSAF_PRIO_NR, + ?ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "inod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", + ?node, i); + snprintf(buff + 1 * ETH_GSTRING_LEN * DSAF_PRIO_NR, + ?ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "onod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", + ?node, i); ? buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
This looks odd and likely incorrect.
? } + buff += 1 * DSAF_PRIO_NR * ETH_GSTRING_LEN; ? }