On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:34:59 PM CEST Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
@@ -78,9 +79,9 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
#define TASK_SIZE_32 UL(0x100000000)
-#define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
+#define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? \
TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
-#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \
+#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_thread(tsk) ? \
It should be
+#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk)) ? \
is_compat_thread takes "struct thread_info *thread" while TASK_SIZE_OF takes
"struct task_struct *tsk"tsk.
If that doesn't throw an error does that mean that TASK_SIZE_OF is
unused?
I think that is correct. On some architectures, TASK_SIZE (which is used)
is defined as TASK_SIZE_OF(current), but the definition above doesn't
do that and there are no other users.
Arnd