[PATCHv4 4/7] Documentation: dt: socfpga: Add Arria10 Ethernet binding
flat view
From: Thor Thayer <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-21 14:43:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Rob, On 06/21/2016 08:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:50:49AM -0500, tthayer at opensource.altera.com wrote:quoted
From: Thor Thayer <redacted> Add the device tree bindings needed to support the Altera Ethernet FIFO buffers on the Arria10 chip. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <redacted> --- v2 No Change v3 Change to common compatible string based on maintainer comments Add local IRQ values. v4 Add compatible string for parent node. --- .../bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-eccmgr.txt | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-eccmgr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-eccmgr.txt index 15eb0df..7c714ba 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-eccmgr.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-eccmgr.txt@@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ Required Properties: - interrupts : Should be single bit error interrupt, then double bit error interrupt, in this order. +Ethernet FIFO ECC +Required Properties: +- compatible : Should be "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc" +- reg : Address and size for ECC block registers. +- parent : phandle to parent (altr,socfpga-stmmac) Ethernet node.Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but I was suggesting changing 'parent' to 'altr,ethernet-mac': altr,ethernet-mac = <&gmac0>; Rob
Ahh, I see what you're saying.
I used parent as the tag because I have a generic function for
validating that the parent status is "okay" using the "parent" string in
my validate_parent_available() function (see below).
I will be submitting other peripheral FIFOs with EDAC protection in
future patches (USB, DMA, etc).
static int validate_parent_available(struct device_node *np)
{
struct device_node *parent;
int ret = 0;
/* Ensure parent device is enabled if parent node exists */
parent = of_parse_phandle(np, "parent", 0);
if (parent && !of_device_is_available(parent))
ret = -ENODEV;
of_node_put(parent);
return ret;
}
I can change this to using a passed in data string but the code won't be
as straightforward.
Thanks for reviewing,
Thor