Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-16

[PATCH v2] arm64: allow building with kcov coverage on ARM64

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2016-06-16 16:25:39
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 04:44:12PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
quoted
I think it's time to ask now :)
If I receive "Tested-by" or "Acked-by" responses, do I need to send
out a patch adding them, or should I rely on the maintainer taking the
patch to the tree?
The first option reduces the amount of work done by the maintainer,
while the second one reduces the traffic in the list.
Sorry, I couldn't find the answer in the manuals.
It's up to the maintainer, so it varies. The best thing to do is to ask
the maintainer what they'd prefer.

From my experience, Catalin is usually happy to add tags, so I suspect
he'd be happy to do so for this patch (assuming he's happy to pick it
up). I'll leave it for him to say either way.
I usually cherry-pick tags that I see in reply to the *latest* version
of the patch (I have a rudimentary script to do this).

I noticed that there was an ack on v1 form Marc Z that's missing in v2.
Maybe it no longer applies, I can't tell, but I usually expect
subsequent versions of a patch to include all the previously given acks
(of course, if they still apply, sometimes a patch rewrite means
dropping those tags).

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help