[RFC PATCH 1/2] Input: rotary-encoder- Add support for absolute encoder
From: vigneshr@ti.com (Vignesh R)
Date: 2016-06-16 10:48:34
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-input, linux-omap, lkml
Hi Dmitry, On Wednesday 25 May 2016 02:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
Hi Dmitry, On 05/23/2016 02:48 PM, R, Vignesh wrote:quoted
On 5/20/2016 10:04 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:quoted
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:34:00PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:quoted
There are rotary-encoders where GPIO lines reflect the actual position of the rotary encoder dial. For example, if dial points to 9, then four GPIO lines connected to the rotary encoder will read HLLH(1001b = 9). Add support for such rotary-encoder. The driver relies on rotary-encoder,absolute-encoder DT property to detect such encoders. Since, GPIO IRQs are not necessary to work with such encoders, optional polling mode support is added using input_poll_dev skeleton. This is can be used by enabling CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT.Does this really belong to a rotary encoder and not a new driver that simply translates gpio-encoded value into ABS* event?Currently rotary encoder driver only supports incremental/step counting rotary devices. However, the device that is there on am335x-ice is an absolute encoder but, IMO, nevertheless a kind of rotary encoder. The only difference is that there is no need to count steps and the absolute position value is always available as binary encoded state of connected GPIOs. The hardware on am335x-ice is a mechanical rotary encoder switch connected over 4 GPIOs. It is same as binary encoder described at [1] (except there are 4 GPIO lines), so this lead me to add support in rotary-encoder. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotary_encoder#Standard_binary_encodingCould you please comment on how would you like to support above described encoder: As a new driver or with existing driver with new compatible/mode setting via DT or as suggest by Uwe in another reply? IMHO, supporting using existing driver with new mode/compatible string looks a better option as the hardware is a kind of rotary-encoder.
It would be great if you could comment on how would you like to see support for absolute rotary-encoder(the one I described above)? As a new driver or handle it by adding new compatible to existing rotary-encoder driver? -- Regards Vignesh