Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-03

[PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: DT: Add DT property for operation mode configuration

From: Fan Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-03 05:42:15
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml

Hi Mark,

On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 01:16 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:20:35PM +0800, Fan Chen wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 12:28 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
In the case of svs[1], which Henry mentioned in cover letter, it can be
regarded as a special consumer who requires very accurate voltage for
calibration the hardware in its initialization stage. So, this kinds of
consumers know their regulator very well and only need to switch to the
modes they want in the particular conditions.
So what you're trying to do here is not so much set a specific mode as
set maximum regulation accuracy for a period of time.
exactly.
quoted
However, IIUC, you want a proposal to provide a sort of QoS framework
which can cover most of use cases who care about the regular quality in
runtime, is that correct?
Well, we want a coherent general use case that doesn't require a user to
know the specific details of the regulator they're working with since we
need to hide that knowledge from the user.
Agreed, it is hard to control once expose too many details. But I think
maybe there still be some parameter user has to aware to decide the
performance/quality in the common use cases you said below.
quoted
IMHO, some quality index can be considered, for example:
Minimum Current Requirement (mA): If a user specified this constraint in
runtime, it means that he cares more about the supplying quality like
transient voltage drop, ripple above certain load.
Maximum Current Requirement (mA): If a user specified this constraint in
runtime, it means that he cares more about the power consumption under
certain load.
It could be a flexible way instead to tie the operation modes directly.
I'm not sure I really understand these distinctions to be honest,
and specifying minimum loads seems very tricky from a robustness point
of view.

If all you need right now is a way to maximize regulation quality that's
probably a lot easier than anything based on absolute loads or on
multiple "normal operation" modes - it takes a lot of the complexity out
of things as there's no need to consider things like the distinctions
between modes.  We just need a standard operating mode and to know the
highest available mode.  I'm not sure exactly how to do that as an API
though, let me think about it...  your use case isn't one I'd come
across before.
Thanks. Please kindly give us suggestion for this case.
quoted
BTW, we should encourage people here to share more use cases related to
regulator quality issues, especially in runtime, so we can evaluate the
most suitable index to fit the requirements.
More common use cases are around manually doing adaptive mode switching
for regulators that are poor at automatically adjusting performance and
handling of very low standby current situations where the adaption can
consume enough power to register.
Best regards,
Fan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help