On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:48:38AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hi Will,
I think I found a right trace. Following one-liner fixes the issue
beginning from v4.2-rc1 up to v4.4 included:
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static inline bool
early_page_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn)
static inline bool early_page_nid_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
{
- return false;
+ return true;
}
How does that make a difference in v4.4 since commit
974a786e63c96a2401a78ddba926f34c128474f1 removed the only
early_page_nid_uninitialised() ? It further doesn't make sense if deferred
memory initialisation is not enabled as the pages will always be
initialised.
From what I understood, now order-0 allocation keep no reserve at all.
Watermarks should still be preserved. zone_watermark_ok is still there.
What might change is the size of reserves for high-order atomic
allocations only. Fragmentation shouldn't be a factor. I'm missing some
major part of the picture.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs