[PATCH 2/3] of/numa: fix a memory@ dt node can only contains one memory block

On 2016/5/26 21:13, Rob Herring wrote:

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:43:58AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:

quoted

For a normal memory@ devicetree node, its reg property can contains more
memory blocks.

Because we don't known how many memory blocks maybe contained, so we try
from index=0, increase 1 until error returned(the end).

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <redacted>
---
 drivers/of/of_numa.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
index 21d831f..2c5f249 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
 	struct device_node *np = NULL;
 	struct resource rsrc;
 	u32 nid;
-	int r = 0;
+	int i, r = 0;

 	for (;;) {
 		np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "memory");

@@ -82,17 +82,27 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
 			/* some other error */
 			break;

-		r = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc);
-		if (r) {
-			pr_err("NUMA: bad reg property in memory node\n");
-			break;
+		for (i = 0; ; i++) {
+			r = of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc);
+			if (r) {
+				/* reached the end of of_address */
+				if (i > 0) {
+					r = 0;
+					break;
+				}
+
+				pr_err("NUMA: bad reg property in memory node\n");
+				goto finished;
+			}
+
+			r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
+					    rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1);
+			if (r)
+				goto finished;
 		}
-
-		r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
-				    rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1);
-		if (r)
-			break;
 	}
+
+finished:
 	of_node_put(np);

This function can be simplified down to:

	for_each_node_by_type(np, "memory") {

OK, That's good.

		r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid);
		if (r == -EINVAL)
			/*
			 * property doesn't exist if -EINVAL, continue
			 * looking for more memory nodes with
			 * "numa-node-id" property
			 */
			continue;

Hi, everybody:
    If some "memory" node contains "numa-node-id", but some others missed. Can we simply ignored it?
I think we should break out too, and faking to only have node0.

		else if (r)
			/* some other error */
			break;

		r = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc);
		for (i = 0; !r; i++, r = of_address_to_resource(np, i, 

But r(non-zero) is just break this loop, the original is break the outer for (;;) loop

How about as below?

	for_each_node_by_type(np, "memory") {
		... ...

		for (i = 0; !of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc); i++) {
                        r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
                                            rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1);
                        if (r)
                                goto finished;
                }

		if (!i)
			pr_err("NUMA: bad reg property in memory node\n");
	}

finished:
	

&rsrc)) {
			r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
				    rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1);
		}
	}
	of_node_put(np);

	return r;


Perhaps with a "if (!i && r) pr_err()" for an error message at the end.

Rob

.