Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2016-05-23

[RFC PATCH 2/3] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: Enable ADMA2

From: Peter Ujfalusi <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-19 08:05:11
Also in: linux-mmc, linux-omap, lkml

On 05/19/2016 09:06 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi Peter,

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 03:54 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
quoted
On 05/18/16 11:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
quoted
omap hsmmc host controller has ADMA2 feature. Enable it here
for better read and write throughput. Add a new dt binding
"ti,use_adma" to enable ADMA2.

Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt      |    1 +
 drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c                      |  320 ++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/platform_data/hsmmc-omap.h           |    1 +
 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
index 74166a0..eb5ceec2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ specifier is required.
 dma-names: List of DMA request names. These strings correspond
 1:1 with the DMA specifiers listed in dmas. The string naming is
 to be "rx" and "tx" for RX and TX DMA requests, respectively.
+ti,use_adma: enable adma2 feature
Do we have use case when you want to fall back to generic DMA instead of aDMA2?
IMHO if the driver supports aDMA2, it is going to use it instead of the
generic s/eDMA.
What I mean is:
the driver implements the aDMA2 support.
if the IP has support for aDMA2, then it is going to use it, otherwise it will
use the generic DMA.
hmm.. how will the driver know if the IP has support for aDMA2. Using dt
binding is one way. Using MMCHS_HL_HWINFO is another way but then the register
offsets in omap_hsmmc driver has to be modified for omap4+.
I remember Felipe saying that MMCHS_HL_HWINFO is not reliable for some reason?
But in any case it would be better IMHO if we query the HW for Master DMA
support and if it is available we will use it.

If it is really the case that MMCHS_HL_HWINFO is not reliable, then probably
have a flag for the MMC/SD phandle saying that ti,master_dma_supported to
indicate that it is capable has ADMA support also.

-- 
P?ter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help