On Tue 17 May 17:43 PDT 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi David,

On Tue, 17 May 2016 14:11:54 -0400 (EDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Bjorn Andersson <redacted>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:19:09 -0700

quoted

I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
the merge conflict.  

Pulled, thanks.

Except in the merge resolution, the 2 new functions added to
include/linux/soc/qcom/smd.h (qcom_smd_get_drvdata and
qcom_smd_set_drvdata) were not marked "static inline" :-(

How silly of me to miss that, sorry about that.

I didn't spot this in my compile testing either, because this is the
only driver in the tree including that file that doesn't depend on
QCOM_SMD.

As there is no immediate problem with moving forward I suggest that I'll
fix this, through arm-soc, once the code has landed.

Regards,
Bjorn