On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jayachandran C [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:30:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:37:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

quoted

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Tomasz Nowicki [off-list ref] wrote:

[cut]

If we are moving the ACPI/PCI code from drivers/acpi to
arch/arm64/ , there is an issue in having the header file
ecam.h in drivers/pci

The current include of "../pci/ecam.h" is slightly ugly (Arnd
and David had already noted this), but including the driver
header from arch code would be even worse.

I can either merge ecam.h into include/linux/pci.h
or move it to a new file include/linux/pci-ecam.h, any
suggestion on which is preferable?

My preference would be pci-ecam.h as we did a similar thing for
pci-dma.h, for example, but basically this is up to Bjorn.