Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 6 authors, 2016-05-12

[PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-11 10:40:40
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: David Daney <redacted>

Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
AArch32 state")
[...]
quoted
David Daney (2):
  arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages.
  acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.

Hanjun Guo (11):
  acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
  acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
  acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
  acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
  arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
  x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
  acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
    drivers/acpi/numa.c
  acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
  acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
    drivers/acpi/numa.c
  arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64

Robert Richter (1):
  acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
I need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14].
There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been
largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take
a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way.

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help