On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:37:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:

On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the registration
facing APIs where it converts struct clk pointers into struct
clk_hw pointers almost immediately.

Let's add clk_hw based registration APIs so that we can skip the
conversion step and provide a way for clk provider drivers to
operate exclusively on clk_hw structs. This way we clearly
split the API between consumers and providers.

Cc: Russell King <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
---

Applied to clk-next

It would have been nice if you could wait a little longer.  As I've just
explained in another email, I've been away last weekend from Thursday
21st through until Tuesday 26th.  I then spent Wednesday and Thursday
catching up with the resulting backlog of email, and last weekend (30th
through to the 2nd May) was a bank holiday weekend in the UK.  So
there's only been _one_ day that I could have looked at your patches,
but unfortunately the little matter of doing stuff for paying customers
got in the way.

A little more patience would have been nice.

I'll try to look at them this evening.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.