On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:06:27PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:12 +0200
Thierry Reding [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:

quoted

Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform
reference config (specified through the PWM lookup table, DT definition or
directly hardcoded in PWM drivers).

Create a pwm_args struct to store this reference config, so that PWM users
can differentiate the current config from the reference one.

Patch all places where pwm->args should be initialized. We keep the
pwm_set_polarity/period() calls until all PWM users are patched to
use pwm_args instead of pwm_get_period/polarity().

Perhaps a helper would be useful? Something like:

	static inline void
	pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_args *args)
	{
		pwm_set_duty_cycle(pwm, args->duty_cycle);
		pwm_set_period(pwm, args->period);
	}

? That would make it slightly easier to get rid of it again after all
clients have been converted.

With the exception of pwm-clps711x all of these args are set at of_xlate
time (for DT) or from the lookup table in pwm_get() (for non-DT), so it
might even be possible to move this call to the core, so that removal of
it will be a one-liner.

Okay, I think I misunderstood your suggestion. I thought you wanted
this helper to set the reference config, but you actually want to apply
a new state based on the PWM reference values.

Except that pwm_args does not contain all the required information to
apply a full config (args->duty_cycle and args->enable do not exist).

This being said, in my v6 I moved the content of
pwm_regulator_adjust_pwm_config() (patch 27) into a generic helper
(pwm_adjust_config()). This helper is doing pretty much what you're
suggesting here (but again, I'm not sure I correctly understood your
suggestion :-/).

I'm not suggesting that pwm_apply_args() apply any state. I think we
both agreed earlier that the initial state (represented by pwm_args) was
never to be automatically applied.

What I was suggesting is that we move all the calls to pwm_set_period()
and pwm_set_duty_cycle() into a central location to make it easier to
remove them later in the series. This is really only temporary, so I
don't mind if we leave the calls sprinkled all over the place. At least
that way I hope we'll avoid confusion about what we're talking about =)

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160412/dc4900ae/attachment.sig>