On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:39:20PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:

Hi,

http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=146014314115625&w=2 series works with
v4.6-rc2 kernel, however, it fails with linux-next for suspend-to-ram
(mem) on BeagleBoard-X15

next-20160327 - good
next-20160329 - good
next-20160330 - Fails to boot - I2C crashes
next-20160331-  Fails to boot - USB crashes
next-20160401 -> bad
next-20160408 -> bad

Bisect log of next-20160408 vs v4.6-rc2 ->
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15697856/

# first bad commit: [2b629704a2b6a5b239f23750e5517a9d8c3a4e8c]
mm/slab: clean-up kmem_cache_node setup

Hello,

I made a mistake on that patch. Could you try to test below one on
top of it.

Thanks.

--------->8----------------

From d3af3cc409527e9be6beb62ea395cde67f3c5029 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Joonsoo Kim <redacted>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:48:29 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm/slab: clean-up kmem_cache_node setup-fix

After calling free_block(), we need to re-calculate array_cache's
avail counter. Fix it.

And, it's better to free objects in shared array when it is
really necessary. Check it before calling free_block().

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <redacted>
---
 mm/slab.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index fcd5fbb..27cb390 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c

@@ -927,9 +927,10 @@ static int setup_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 
 	n = get_node(cachep, node);
 	spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
-	if (n->shared) {
+	if (n->shared && force_change) {
 		free_block(cachep, n->shared->entry,
 				n->shared->avail, node, &list);
+		n->shared->avail = 0;
 	}
 
 	if (!n->shared || force_change) {

-- 
1.9.1