[RFC PATCH 00/45] KVM: arm/arm64: Rework virtual GIC emulation
From: Christoffer Dall <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-31 18:28:42
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
Hi Andre, On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 02:04:23AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
This series is a joint effort to re-implement KVM's GIC emulation. While the current implementation is centered around providing efficient MMIO emulation, the hot path for most guests is actually the guest entry and exit, which currently is rather costly. Also the existing emulation has a global distributor lock, which quickly becomes a bottleneck once the number of VCPUs increases. Additionally the emulation was originally designed for GICv2, adding GICv3 ITS emulation support to this proved to be rather painful. Last, but not least the existing code became less and less maintainable, with many special cases handled explicitly. The new implementation is build around a struct vgic_irq data data structure, which holds all information about a virtual interrupt. Interruts which should be injected are hold in a per-VCPU list, this make the entry/exit path much more efficient. Also the new structure allows to have more fine grained locking - per IRQ and per VCPU - getting rid of the global distributor lock. As a result of the new design ITS emulation fits in more nicely, the respective code will be provided as a follow-up series. This series implements the same feature set as the existing emulation, as a goodie we now implement priorities correctly. To allow an easy transition with good test coverage, but still maintain stability, both implementations live side by side, selectable via a Kconfig option. The default is the new implementation. If this code proves to be reliable, we will later remove the current implementation with an extra patch set. Please have a look at the series, review it and give the code some serious testing (and possibly debugging). All feedback is appreciated.
Huge thanks for all the hard work in putting this together, I'm sure it hasn't been easy. I have gone through this series and I think we're overall in pretty good shape. I haven't reviewed the code in detail, checked every bitfield etc., but focused on the overall design choices, locking correctness etc. A number of patches don't have have commit message and some commit messages could be clarified, but it is what it is. I've given this a quick test on Mustang and on TC2, and it builds and appears to run decently stable. Obviously we should give this some more rigorous testing, but I will wait until v2 with that. I'll probably send the timer/vgic interface changes bits as patches for you to base the next series on, assuming you and the others agreed with my comments and suggestions on that part here. Thanks, -Christoffer