Em Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:03:38 -0300
Javier Martinez Canillas [off-list ref] escreveu:

Hello Mauro,

The patch looks mostly good to me, I just have a question below:

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[off-list ref] wrote:

[snip]

quoted

-void media_device_cleanup(struct media_device *mdev)
+static void media_device_cleanup(struct media_device *mdev)
 {
        ida_destroy(&mdev->entity_internal_idx);
        mdev->entity_internal_idx_max = 0;
        media_entity_graph_walk_cleanup(&mdev->pm_count_walk);
-       mutex_destroy(&mdev->graph_mutex);  

Any reason why this is removed? mutex_init() is still called in
media_device_init() so I believe the destroy should be kept here.

This code is now called only at do_media_device_unregister, with
is protected by the mutex. If we keep the mutex_destroy there,
the mutex will be destroyed in lock state, causing an error if
mutex debug is enabled.

Btw, the standard implementation for the mutex is:
	include/linux/mutex.h:static inline void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock) {}

Only when mutex debug is enabled, it becomes something else:
	include/linux/mutex-debug.h:extern void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock);

With produces a warning if the mutex_destroy() is called with the
mutex is hold. This can never happen with the current implementation, as
the logic is:
	mutex_lock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
	kref_put(&mdev->kref, do_media_device_unregister);
	mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);

We could eventually move the mutex lock to
do_media_device_unregister() and then add there the mutex_destroy()

Regards,
Mauro

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>

Best regards,
Javier

-- 
Thanks,
Mauro