[PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement
From: Dinh Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-08 15:45:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, netdev
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-03-31 · Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement · Giuseppe CAVALLARO <hidden>
- 2016-03-30 · Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement · Dinh Nguyen <hidden>
- 2016-03-15 · Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement · Giuseppe CAVALLARO <hidden>
- 2016-03-15 · Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement · Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>
- 2016-03-14 · Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement · Giuseppe CAVALLARO <hidden>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Dinh, On 3/8/2016 12:22 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: [snip]quoted
I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform: libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found eth0: Could not attach to PHY stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19) If I just revert: "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression" then the issue goes away.do you have this patch "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine" ? Or you just reverted "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"
I only reverted "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression". I do have the patch "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of the xmit routine", but I did not need to revert that patch. Dinh